When an employee dedicates years of their working life to an organisation, the law recognises that loyalty deserves more than just a farewell. That recognition is precisely what the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 provides – a statutory, lump-sum benefit paid to employees upon completing long-term service. Enacted by Parliament on 21 August 1972 and brought into force on 16 September 1972, the Act converted what was once a discretionary gesture by employers into a legally enforceable right. It remains one of the cornerstone pieces of labour welfare legislation in India, sitting squarely at the intersection of employment law and social security.
Table of Contents
- What is gratuity and why does it matter?
- Applicability: who does the Act cover?
- Eligibility: who can claim gratuity?
- What counts as “continuous service”?
- Calculating gratuity: the formula explained
- A worked example
- When does gratuity become payable and how is it paid?
- Forfeiture of gratuity: when can an employer withhold it?
- Forfeiture to the extent of damage
- Partial or whole forfeiture
- Due process before forfeiture
- Protection of gratuity: a guaranteed right
- Nomination: securing the benefit beyond the employee’s lifetime
- The evolving landscape: the Code on Social Security, 2020
What is gratuity and why does it matter?
The word “gratuity” traces its roots to the Latin term gratuitus, meaning something given freely. In Indian law, however, gratuity is anything but discretionary. It is a statutory obligation – a lump-sum amount that an employer must pay to an employee as a financial acknowledgement of their long-term service and loyalty. It is not a component of monthly salary; it is paid out in a single payment when an employee’s service ends, whether through retirement, resignation, death, or disability.
Before the Act was passed, gratuity payments were governed by a patchwork of state-level laws, voluntary agreements, and judicial decisions. The Supreme Court had attempted to regularise the practice through case law, but inconsistencies persisted. The 1972 Act ended that ambiguity by creating a single, uniform central framework applicable across India.
As the Supreme Court observed in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen, the object of the Act is to provide monetary benefit to retiring employees – to bring prosperity to those who spent the most productive years of their lives serving an organisation.
Applicability: who does the Act cover?
The Act casts a wide net. It applies to every establishment – whether a factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company, shop, or other notified establishment – that employs ten or more persons on any single day during the preceding twelve months. Once an establishment crosses this threshold and comes under the Act, it remains covered even if the number of employees later falls below ten. This is a deliberate design to prevent employers from gaming the threshold.
Both permanent and contractual employees are covered, provided they meet the eligibility conditions. Supervisory, clerical, skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled workers all fall within the definition of “employee” under the Act. Apprentices, however, are expressly excluded.
Eligibility: who can claim gratuity?
Under Section 4(1) of the Act, an employee becomes eligible for gratuity only upon the termination of their employment in one of the following circumstances: superannuation, retirement, resignation, death, or disablement due to accident or disease.
Crucially, the employee must have completed a minimum of five years of continuous service with the same employer. This five-year threshold is the most significant eligibility criterion under the Act. One exception applies – if termination occurs due to death or disablement, the five-year requirement is waived entirely, and gratuity is payable regardless of the duration of service.
What counts as “continuous service”?
Continuous service does not mean uninterrupted attendance every single day. Under the Act, interruptions caused by illness, accident, authorised leave, layoff, strike, or even absence without leave (in certain conditions) do not break continuity of service. For calculating whether five years have been served, one year is treated as equivalent to 240 working days in surface establishments and 190 working days for underground establishments such as mines. This nuanced definition protects employees from being denied gratuity on technical grounds.
There is also a practical rule worth noting: if an employee has worked for four years and 240 days, that is treated as the completion of five years of service for gratuity purposes. This interpretation has been widely accepted and significantly benefits employees who fall just short of the five-year mark.
Calculating gratuity: the formula explained
The formula for calculating gratuity under the Act is straightforward. For employees covered by the Act, it is:
Gratuity = (Last drawn salary ร 15 ร Number of completed years of service) รท 26
Here, “last drawn salary” means the basic pay plus dearness allowance at the time of exit. The figure 26 represents the number of working days in a month, and 15 represents the 15 days’ wages that are paid per year of service. The Act rounds off service to completed years – if a part year exceeds six months, it is counted as a full year.
A worked example
Suppose an employee retires after 10 years of service with a last drawn basic salary of โน30,000 per month. The calculation would be: (30,000 ร 15 ร 10) รท 26 = โน1,73,076. This amount is paid as a one-time lump sum. The maximum ceiling on gratuity is currently โน20 lakhs, as revised by a government notification in March 2018. Even if the formula yields a higher figure, the actual payout cannot exceed this cap.
For seasonal workers and piece-rated employees, different calculation methods apply. Seasonal establishment employees receive gratuity at seven days’ wages per season of service instead of fifteen days.
When does gratuity become payable and how is it paid?
Once gratuity becomes due, the employer must pay it within 30 days. The employee (or their nominee, in the event of death) is required to submit an application in the prescribed form. Upon receipt, the employer must determine the amount payable and notify the employee. Payment can be made in cash, by demand draft, or by bank cheque. If the payable amount is below โน1,000 and the recipient requests it, payment may even be made through postal money order.
Where a nominee or legal heir is a minor, the gratuity amount is deposited with the controlling authority, who then invests it in a term deposit with a nationalised bank until the minor reaches majority. If an employer fails to pay within 30 days, simple interest becomes payable on the delayed amount from the date it became due.
Forfeiture of gratuity: when can an employer withhold it?
Forfeiture is the exception, not the rule. An employer cannot simply refuse to pay gratuity because they are unhappy with an employee or because the employee resigned. The Act strictly limits forfeiture to specific, grave circumstances enumerated in Section 4(6).
Forfeiture to the extent of damage
Under Section 4(6)(a), if an employee’s services are terminated because of a wilful omission, negligence, or act that caused damage to or destruction of the employer’s property, the gratuity may be forfeited – but only to the extent of the actual loss or damage caused. The employer cannot forfeit more than what the damage amounts to.
Partial or whole forfeiture
Under Section 4(6)(b), if an employee is terminated for riotous or disorderly conduct, acts of violence during employment, or for committing an offence involving moral turpitude in the course of employment, gratuity may be forfeited either in part or entirely. In Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. v. Regional Labour Commissioner, the Karnataka High Court held that theft by an employee during employment constitutes moral turpitude and justifies total forfeiture of gratuity.
Due process before forfeiture
Courts have consistently held that an employer cannot forfeit gratuity arbitrarily. In Canara Bank v. Appellate Authority (2012), the Karnataka High Court ruled that forfeiture requires quantification of loss and an opportunity for the employee to be heard. The Delhi High Court in Union Bank of India v. D.C. Chaturvedi (2022) further confirmed that three requirements – notification, quantification, and a hearing – must all be satisfied before any forfeiture order is valid.
Importantly, minor misconduct or simple resignation does not justify withholding gratuity. An employee cannot be denied gratuity merely because they refused to vacate company accommodation, as clarified in Air India Ltd. v. Appellate Authority (1998) by the Bombay High Court.
Protection of gratuity: a guaranteed right
The Act also contains a critical protective provision: gratuity payable under the Act is not liable to be attached in execution of any decree or order of a civil, revenue, or criminal court. This means creditors cannot seize an employee’s gratuity to settle personal debts. The Act explicitly overrides any inconsistent provisions in other enactments, contracts, or instruments, reinforcing gratuity as a guaranteed statutory right rather than a contingent benefit.
Employers are also required under Section 4A to obtain compulsory insurance for their gratuity liability from the Life Insurance Corporation of India or another approved insurer. Establishments with 500 or more employees may alternatively establish their own approved gratuity fund. This mechanism ensures that even if an employer faces financial distress, employees are not left without their dues.
Nomination: securing the benefit beyond the employee’s lifetime
The Act allows every employee to nominate a family member to receive gratuity in the event of their death. An employee with a family must nominate one or more family members; any nomination made in favour of a non-family member is void. If the employee has no family at the time of nomination, they may nominate a third person, but this nomination automatically becomes void if they subsequently acquire a family. Nominations can be modified at any time through written notice to the employer.
The evolving landscape: the Code on Social Security, 2020
The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 did not exist in a vacuum – it evolved through amendments and is now set to be subsumed within a broader framework. The Code on Social Security, 2020, which received presidential assent on 28 September 2020 and came into legal effect on 21 November 2025, consolidates nine existing labour laws – including the Payment of Gratuity Act – into a single unified code.
Several significant changes accompany this consolidation. Under the new Code, fixed-term contract employees become eligible for gratuity after just one year of service, rather than five – a major shift that extends protection to millions of contract workers. The Code also mandates that the salary component used for calculating gratuity (now termed “wages”) must constitute at least 50% of an employee’s total cost-to-company, closing a long-standing loophole where employers kept basic pay artificially low to reduce gratuity liability. The Code further extends social security coverage to gig workers and platform workers for the first time in Indian history, recognising the realities of the modern economy.
The fundamental gratuity formula – 15/26 ร eligible salary ร years of service – remains unchanged under the new framework. The โน20 lakh ceiling also continues to apply, though the Central Government retains the power to revise it.
From a broader perspective, the journey from pre-1972 voluntary payments to a codified statutory right, and now to an expanded social security code, reflects the steady maturation of India’s labour welfare landscape – one that increasingly acknowledges not just formal employment but the diverse ways in which people work and contribute.
What do you think? The Payment of Gratuity Act protects long-serving employees, but the five-year minimum service requirement has long been criticised for leaving short-tenure workers without any benefit – does the Code on Social Security, 2020’s one-year rule for fixed-term employees strike the right balance, or should the threshold be lowered further for all categories of workers? And given that gratuity is capped at โน20 lakhs regardless of salary level or years of service, is the current ceiling adequate to provide meaningful financial security in today’s cost-of-living environment?
References
- https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1703?sam_handle=123456789/1362
- https://ijlsss.com/a-reward-for-loyalty-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-the-payment-of-gratuity-act-1972/
- https://hrinformative.com/gratuity-eligibility-calculation-forfeiture/
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/payment-gratuity-act-1972/
- https://corridalegal.com/the-payment-of-gratuity-act-1972-executive-summary-and-bare-act/
- https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/gratuity-payment-eligibility-calculation-and-compliance-norms/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Code_on_Social_Security,_2020
- https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gratuity-law-labour-code.html
Leave a Reply