Imagine living on the streets with no roof over your head, no safe place to call home, and no security for your family. For over 1.8 billion people worldwide, this is not a hypothetical scenario but a harsh reality. The right to shelter has emerged as one of the most critical human rights issues of our time, representing far more than just four walls and a roof. It embodies human dignity, security, and the foundation for a meaningful life.
Table of Contents
- Understanding the right to adequate housing
- The seven essential elements of adequate housing
- Legal security of tenure
- Affordability and accessibility
- Habitability and location
- Cultural adequacy
- The global housing crisis: numbers that demand attention
- The situation in India: a closer look
- Homelessness as an inherited condition
- Housing rights in the Indian Constitution
- The interconnection with other human rights
- Vulnerable populations and housing discrimination
- Government obligations and challenges
- India’s policy responses
- The path forward: from recognition to realization
Understanding the right to adequate housing
The right to adequate housing is recognized as part of the right to an adequate standard of living in international human rights law. Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including housing. This was further strengthened by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 1966, which has been ratified by 153 states.
The right to housing goes beyond merely having a physical structure. According to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, it should be understood as the right to live somewhere in security, peace and dignity. This definition transforms housing from a simple commodity into a fundamental prerequisite for human flourishing.
The seven essential elements of adequate housing
What makes housing truly adequate? The international framework identifies seven key components that must be present for housing to meet human rights standards.
Legal security of tenure
Security of tenure means protection from forced eviction and harassment. Regardless of whether someone owns their home, rents it, or lives in informal housing, they should have legal protection that prevents arbitrary displacement. This security allows individuals and families to build stable lives without the constant fear of losing their homes.
Affordability and accessibility
Housing is not adequate if its cost threatens or compromises the occupants’ enjoyment of other human rights. Globally, households spend an average of 31% of their income on shelter, but in regions like sub-Saharan Africa, this figure rises to 43.5%, leaving little for food, education, or healthcare. Housing must also be accessible to disadvantaged and marginalized groups, including persons with disabilities, the elderly, and minorities.
Habitability and location
Housing must guarantee physical safety, provide adequate space, and offer protection against environmental threats like cold, heat, rain, and structural hazards. Additionally, housing is not adequate if it is cut off from employment opportunities, healthcare services, schools, and other social facilities, or if it is located in polluted or dangerous areas.
Cultural adequacy
Adequate housing must respect and take into account the expression of cultural identity. This means housing design and allocation should consider the cultural practices and needs of different communities, ensuring that housing solutions do not force people to abandon their cultural traditions.
The global housing crisis: numbers that demand attention
The statistics paint a sobering picture. More than 1.8 billion people worldwide lack adequate housing, while approximately 300 million people are homeless. Every year, 2 million people are forcibly evicted, and an estimated 150 million people are homeless worldwide. These numbers represent not just housing units but human lives marked by insecurity, vulnerability, and denied opportunities.
The crisis varies significantly across regions. Over 1 billion people live in slums today, with the affordable housing finance gap potentially totaling $16 trillion. Cities like New York, Los Angeles, Mumbai, and Delhi struggle with large homeless populations despite being economic powerhouses.
The situation in India: a closer look
India faces a particularly acute housing challenge. According to the 2011 Census, there are 1.77 million homeless people in India, representing 0.15% of the total population. However, independent organizations estimate the actual number to be around 2.3 million, as the official count uses a narrow definition that may exclude many living in precarious housing situations.
There is a shortage of 18.78 million houses in the country, and about 65 million Indians lived in slums according to the most recent census in 2021, though this figure is now considered outdated. Another study found that India’s urban housing shortage rose 54 percent to 29 million in 2018 from 18.78 million in 2012.
Homelessness as an inherited condition
A family of four homeless members has an average of five homeless generations in India. This shows that homelessness in India is not situational but often inherited for many generations. The causes are multifaceted, including poverty, lack of affordable housing, unemployment, disability, desertion of vulnerable populations, and rural-urban migration driven by the search for better livelihoods.
Housing rights in the Indian Constitution
While the Indian Constitution does not explicitly mention housing as a fundamental right, the Supreme Court of India has held in several judgements that the human right to adequate housing is a fundamental right emanating from the right to life protected by Article 21. Article 21 states that no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.
The landmark case of Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation in 1985 acknowledged the right to livelihood and shelter as essential to existence. Subsequently, the Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. case in 1996 specifically affirmed that the right to shelter constitutes a fundamental right under Article 21.
In a significant 2025 judgment, the Supreme Court determined that the right to housing constitutes a fundamental right under Article 21, equating it with the rights to life and dignity. The Court emphasized that housing is not merely a contractual entitlement but a facet of the fundamental right to life, and directed the Union Government to establish mechanisms for protecting homebuyers and completing stalled real estate projects.
The interconnection with other human rights
The violation of the right to adequate housing may affect the enjoyment of a wide range of other human rights. Access to adequate housing serves as a precondition for enjoying several other fundamental rights including the rights to work, health, social security, vote, privacy, and education.
Without proof of residency, homeless persons may not be able to vote, enjoy social services, or receive healthcare. Schools may refuse to register slum children because their settlements have no official status. The possibility of earning a living can be seriously impaired when a person is relocated following forced eviction to a place removed from employment opportunities. This interconnectedness highlights why housing is not just a shelter issue but a gateway to full participation in society.
Vulnerable populations and housing discrimination
Housing discrimination affects various marginalized groups disproportionately. Women face severe discrimination regarding security of tenure, as tenure is often understood, recorded, or registered in the name of men, leaving women dependent on male relatives for tenure security. Without control over housing, land, or property, women enjoy little personal or economic autonomy and are more vulnerable to abuse.
Other groups facing housing challenges include religious and ethnic minorities, indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, migrants, and refugees. These populations often live in the most appalling conditions, face spatial segregation that excludes them from equal access to public services, and experience systematic barriers to adequate housing.
Government obligations and challenges
States that have ratified human rights treaties are required to give effect to housing rights within their jurisdictions. Each state should guarantee at least minimum essential levels of this right, ensuring that significant numbers are not deprived of basic shelter and housing.
The right to adequate housing is subject to progressive realization, meaning a state’s compliance is assessed in light of available resources. However, lack of resources cannot justify inaction or indefinite postponement of measures. States have an immediate obligation to take concrete steps including adopting appropriate legislative, administrative, budgetary, judicial, and promotional measures.
India’s policy responses
After independence, India did not develop programs for the homeless until the Eighth Five-Year Plan (1992-97). The 11th plan (2007-12) declared access to a roof over one’s head as a fundamental right. India launched the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) in 2015-16 to provide affordable housing by 2022, later extended to 2025, targeting Economically Weaker Sections, Low Income Groups, and Middle Income Groups in both urban and rural areas.
Despite these initiatives, significant challenges remain. Only about 12% of urban homeless have access to a shelter home, around half do not have access to health services, and only 18% could avail subsidized ration through the public distribution system. The schemes for homeless populations place little emphasis on mental health and substance use disorders, which are common among this population.
The path forward: from recognition to realization
Failing to recognize, protect, and fulfill the right to adequate housing results in the violation of a plethora of fundamental rights including the right to work, education, health, and security. The gap between legal recognition and ground reality requires coordinated action from governments, civil society, and international bodies.
Solutions exist but require sustained investment and political will. These include regularization of tenure, incremental building approaches, public-private partnerships, stronger enforcement of housing regulations, affordable housing policies with real impact, and dedicated funding mechanisms for stalled projects. Investing in shelter for the world’s poor is as vital as schools and clinics in the fight against poverty.
What do you think? Can housing ever be truly treated as a fundamental right when market forces treat it as a commodity for speculation? How can developing countries like India balance rapid urbanization with the constitutional obligation to provide adequate housing for all citizens?
References
- https://www.ohchr.org/en/housing
- https://www.housingrightswatch.org/page/un-housing-rights
- https://unhabitat.org/programme/housing-rights
- https://www.developmentaid.org/news-stream/post/203238/housing-crisis-in-2025
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_India
- https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2023/8/30/photos-the-housing-crisis-for-the-poor-in-indias-capital
- https://hlrn.org.in/documents/Indian_Law_and_Policy.htm
- https://www.legalbites.in/constitutional-law/is-the-right-to-housing-a-fundamental-right-under-article-21-1187752
- https://www.studyiq.com/articles/right-to-housing-as-a-fundamental-right/
- https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019-05/fact_sheet_21_adequate_housing_final_2010.pdf
- https://www.borgenmagazine.com/shelters-in-india/
Leave a Reply