Strategic Financial Management in Panchayats: Experiences from Himachal Pradesh, West Bengal, and Karnataka

Panchayats are constitutionally mandated to function as institutions of self-governance, but their actual effectiveness depends heavily on how well they manage their finances. The Reserve Bank of India’s report on Panchayati Raj Institution finances for 2022-23 reveals a stark reality: nearly 95% of Panchayat revenue comes from Central and State grants, with own tax revenue contributing barely 1% of the total. Against this backdrop, the experiences of Himachal Pradesh, West Bengal, and Karnataka offer three very different stories – of challenges overcome, systems built, and innovations adopted – that together illuminate what strategic financial management in Panchayats actually looks like on the ground.

The constitutional and legislative framework for Panchayat finances 🔗

The foundation of Panchayat financial management lies in the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992, which gave Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) constitutional status and empowered them to levy and collect taxes, duties, tolls, and fees. It also mandated that each state constitute a State Finance Commission (SFC) every five years under Article 243-I to review PRI finances and recommend how tax proceeds should be shared between the state and Panchayats.

However, the constitutional mandate alone does not determine outcomes. The actual depth of financial devolution depends on what each state legislature enacts, how State Finance Commissions interpret their remit, and how efficiently Panchayats are equipped to manage what they receive. This is where the experiences of Himachal Pradesh, West Bengal, and Karnataka diverge significantly.

Himachal Pradesh: grant-dependent but reforming 🔗

Himachal Pradesh has 3,243 Gram Panchayats spread across difficult mountainous terrain, which itself shapes the financial challenges its PRIs face. A CAG audit report on HP’s local bodies found that the major source of PRI funds during 2005-06 to 2008-09 was State government grants (55%) and Central government grants (39%), with own-source revenue (OSR) remaining negligible. This heavy grant dependency is not unique to HP, but the state’s geographic fragmentation and limited tax base make diversifying revenue sources particularly difficult.

The state enacted the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 under which Gram Panchayats have the authority to levy taxes on property, profession, and entertainment. In practice, however, tax collection rates have remained low due to administrative capacity gaps, shortage of trained staff at the Panchayat level, and unclear enforcement mechanisms. The same CAG report noted that the state had not adopted the standard formats for budget and accounting systems prescribed by the CAG – a structural weakness that hampered financial discipline and transparency.

The role of State Finance Commissions in HP 🔗

Himachal Pradesh has constituted multiple SFCs over the years, most recently the Sixth SFC in 2022. The Sixth HP SFC was tasked with reviewing the financial position of Panchayats and recommending principles for distributing taxes and grants from the Consolidated Fund of the State to PRIs. Under the 15th Finance Commission award applicable to Himachal Pradesh, grant allocations for PRIs span 2021-22 to 2025-26, structured as basic untied grants and basic tied grants – with untied grants providing Panchayats more flexibility in spending based on local felt needs.

A persistent concern in HP is the gap between SFC recommendations and their actual implementation. While SFCs have consistently called for improving PRI financial capacity and increasing their share of state revenues, follow-through has been partial. The Sixth SFC itself noted that even district-level data on PRI income and expenditure was being entered manually, highlighting that digitization of financial records had not been effectively established, a gap that limits real-time financial monitoring.

Own-source revenue and OSR rules in HP 🔗

Despite these challenges, Himachal Pradesh is among the states that have enacted Own Source Revenue (OSR) rules for Panchayats. HP is listed as one of the states where OSR rules are in place alongside Karnataka, West Bengal, and others. However, having OSR rules on paper and actually generating meaningful own revenue are two different things. The 16th Finance Commission has now introduced a performance-linked OSR condition: Gram Panchayats must generate at least ₹1,200 per household per year in own-source revenue to qualify for the performance component of rural local body grants – an incentive designed to push states like HP to close the implementation gap.

West Bengal: building systems for accountability 🔗

West Bengal stands out for having one of the highest average revenues per Panchayat among Indian states. West Bengal came a close second to Kerala, with an average revenue of ₹57 lakh per Panchayat – well above the national average. This is partly a function of the state’s relatively dense population, which expands the tax base, but it is also a product of deliberate institutional investments in financial management infrastructure.

The West Bengal Panchayat Management System (WBPMS) 🔗

One of West Bengal’s most significant contributions to Panchayat financial management is the West Bengal Panchayat Management System (WBPMS) – a digital platform that consolidates financial and administrative data across all three tiers of PRIs: Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti, and Zilla Parishad. The system tracks fund disbursements, honoraria for elected members, and financial flows at the village level, creating a digital record of PRI transactions that was previously unavailable.

The WBPMS connects directly with the Banglar Panchayat mobile application, which allows citizens to access Gram Panchayat data including administrative details, development project status, and elected representative information. This citizen-facing interface is a key accountability tool – it turns financial and governance data into publicly accessible information, reducing information asymmetry between the Panchayat and the people it serves.

WBIFMS and integrated financial management 🔗

At the state level, West Bengal’s West Bengal Integrated Financial Management System (WBIFMS) provides the broader digital backbone within which Panchayat finances operate. The system integrates budgeting, e-billing, treasury operations, and fund disbursement into a single platform, replacing paper-based processes that led to delays and errors. Every rupee allocated can be traced from its source to final expenditure. Key modules include e-Bantan (electronic budget allocation and re-allotment), e-Pradan (direct electronic payments to vendors and service providers), and GRIPS (Government Receipt Portal System, enabling citizens to pay taxes and fees online).

For Panchayats specifically, this means that fund releases from state and central government flow through a traceable digital pathway. The Asian Development Bank’s assessment of West Bengal’s public finance management reforms confirmed that the IFMS has significantly improved transparency and accountability in fund utilization across rural local bodies.

Fund allocation structure in West Bengal 🔗

The West Bengal Panchayat and Rural Development Department manages the distribution of 15th Finance Commission grants to Panchayats in two instalments per year. Basic untied grants – which constitute 40% of the allocation – give Gram Panchayats discretionary spending authority over local priorities, excluding salary and establishment expenditure. The remaining 60% as basic tied grants must be spent on specific sector mandates, primarily sanitation and drinking water. This split is designed to balance accountability (ensuring basic services are funded) with local autonomy (allowing Panchayats to address context-specific needs).

Karnataka: the national leader in financial devolution 🔗

Karnataka occupies a unique position in India’s Panchayat finance landscape. Karnataka tops the national Devolution Index – including the key sub-indices of ‘Finances’ and ‘Accountability’ – as assessed by the Indian Institute of Public Administration. This is not accidental; it is the result of sustained legislative commitment, administrative support, and a deliberate policy of fiscal empowerment for Panchayats.

The Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 🔗

The governing legislation is the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (renamed in 2017), which gives Gram Panchayats broad taxing powers – covering property taxes, entertainment taxes, profession taxes, fees for licences and permissions, and more. The Act also establishes a Grama Panchayat Fund into which all receipts flow and from which all expenditures are drawn, creating a unified fund structure that simplifies audit and accountability. Under the Act, Panchayats are also empowered to raise loans and form a sinking fund for capital expenditure.

Karnataka grants Panchayats maximum power to levy taxes and non-taxes, and the state is among the front runners in releasing and utilizing 15th Finance Commission grants on time. SFC recommendations are implemented in a timely manner, and fund releases to Panchayats follow the commission’s approved formula – a standard that many states fall short of.

Accountability mechanisms: audit, social audit, and e-receipts 🔗

Karnataka has built a multi-layered accountability structure around Panchayat finances. At the primary level, the Karnataka State Audit and Accounts Department (KSAAD) audits Gram Panchayat accounts, while the CAG provides Technical Guidance and Support under Section 20(1) of the CAG (DPC) Act. Separate audit reports are issued for each Zilla Panchayat, and a consolidated report covers all Taluk Panchayats. Accounts of Taluk Panchayat funds are mandatorily audited by the CAG under Section 253 of the KPR Act.

Karnataka also leads the country in social audit. The state notified the Scheme Implementation of Social Audit Rules, 2011 and established an independent Social Audit Directorate registered as a society. Social Audit Reports (SARs) must be approved by the Gram Sabha and submitted to district and state-level authorities within 48 hours of completion. Karnataka has the highest score nationally in the social audit indicator under the Devolution Index, reflecting how deeply embedded this accountability mechanism has become in the state’s Panchayat governance.

On the revenue side, the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj (Taxes, Rates and Fees) Rules, 2021 require Gram Panchayats to issue e-receipts for all payments, and the SAMARTH Panchayat Portal digitally empowers Panchayats to collect and monitor revenue under the OSR framework in real time. This digital integration of tax collection – from bill generation to receipt issuance – has significantly improved own-source revenue tracking in Karnataka.

Comparing the three states: key lessons 🔗

Placing the three states side by side reveals both the diversity of approaches and the common principles that drive effective Panchayat financial management.

Grant dependency vs. own revenue: All three states rely heavily on Central and State grants, reflecting the national pattern documented in the RBI’s PRI finance report. However, Karnataka and West Bengal have made more systematic progress in augmenting and tracking their own-source revenues, while Himachal Pradesh continues to struggle with converting its OSR framework into on-ground results.

Legislative strength: Karnataka’s legislation is the most enabling, granting Panchayats the widest taxing powers and the clearest financial structure. The HP Act provides the framework but has been less effectively operationalized. West Bengal’s strength lies less in its taxing powers and more in its systems for managing and distributing the grants that Panchayats receive.

Digital innovation: West Bengal’s WBPMS and WBIFMS represent the most integrated state-level digital financial management system for Panchayats. Karnataka complements this with e-receipts and real-time OSR monitoring through the SAMARTH portal. Himachal Pradesh lags behind – even district-level financial data was being entered manually in recent years, pointing to the gap between policy intent and technological implementation.

Accountability depth: Karnataka’s combination of CAG audit, KSAAD audit, and an independent Social Audit Directorate gives it the most robust accountability architecture. West Bengal’s citizen-facing WBPMS and Banglar Panchayat app create public accountability from below. HP’s accountability mechanisms exist on paper but face implementation constraints due to capacity and staffing limitations.

The road ahead: what these experiences tell us 🔗

The 16th Finance Commission’s recommendation that Panchayats must generate at least ₹1,200 per household annually in OSR to qualify for performance grants raises the stakes for all three states. For Karnataka, this is a reachable benchmark. For West Bengal, it is an achievable target given the existing digital infrastructure. For Himachal Pradesh, it is a significant challenge that will require both capacity building and administrative reform.

What the experiences of these three states ultimately demonstrate is that financial management in Panchayats is not just about how much money flows in – it is about the quality of the legal framework, the strength of digital systems, the depth of audit mechanisms, and the ability to generate and use own resources responsibly. The SAMARTH Panchayat Portal, the WBPMS, and the evolving SFC frameworks all point toward a future where Panchayat finances are more transparent, more traceable, and more accountable to the communities they serve.

What do you think? Given that Karnataka tops the national Devolution Index while Himachal Pradesh continues to face challenges in own-source revenue collection, do you think geography and terrain are sufficient explanations for financial underperformance in hill-state Panchayats – or do legislative and administrative choices matter more? And as digital tools like WBIFMS and the SAMARTH portal become central to Panchayat financial management, how should states ensure that Panchayat-level officials are trained adequately to use them?

References

1. https://www.rbi.org.in
2. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/finances-of-panchayati-raj-institutions
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panchayati_raj_in_India
4. https://cag.gov.in/en/audit-report/details/9895
5. https://planning.hp.gov.in/NewReleases/6th%20SFC%20Report.pdf
6. https://www.business-standard.com/finance/news/own-source-revenue-of-panchayats-remains-at-rs-59-per-capita-in-2017-22-124111600476_1.html
7. https://civilstaphimachal.com/current-affair/finances-of-panchayati-raj-institutions/
8. https://wbpms.in/
9. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.braut.pnrd.banglarpanchayat&hl=en_IN
10. https://www.kanakkupillai.com/learn/wbifms-portal/
11. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/54001/54001-001-prtr-en.pdf
12. https://prd.wb.gov.in/schemes/detail/552bf96d-5e91-4a2d-8415-886dc6f85b2c
13. https://decentralization.net/2025/02/the-status-of-devolution-to-panchayats-in-india/
14. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/7595?view_type=browse
15. https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2022/9%20Chapter%20I%20ATIR%202019%20&%202020-converted%20(1)%20(1)-062341ee6614079.74275962.pdf
16. https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s316026d60ff9b54410b3435b403afd226/uploads/2025/01/20250110178329771.pdf
17. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/amp/story/governance/grants-expanded-under-16th-finance-commission-recommendations-but-gram-panchayats-face-stricter-compliance-requirements
18. https://samarthpanchayat.gov.in/