Strengthening Roots: Tribal Co-operatives’ Role in Empowering Indigenous Communities

Last updated on:

India is home to over 104 million tribal people, constituting about 8.6% of the national population and spread across 577 recognized Scheduled Tribe communities. Despite this significant presence, tribal communities have historically remained among the most economically marginalized groups – cut off from mainstream markets, dependent on exploitative middlemen, and left with little institutional support. Tribal co-operatives, specifically Large Sized Adivasi Multi-Purpose Societies (LAMPS) and Tribal Development Co-operative Corporations (TDCC), were designed to change this. They function as community-owned institutions that address credit access, fair marketing, consumer goods supply, and agricultural input distribution – all under one roof.

Table of Contents

The problem tribal co-operatives were built to solve

Before formal co-operative structures took root in tribal areas, the economic reality for most Adivasi communities was grim. Traders who purchased forest and agricultural produce from tribals were typically moneylenders too, often buying goods as repayment for debts at prices far below market value. Since many tribal collectors had no means to verify prices or wait for better offers, this cycle of debt and under-payment was self-reinforcing.

Problems like the perishable nature of minor forest produce, lack of storage capacity, absence of marketing infrastructure, and exploitation by middlemen left tribal families structurally dependent on those who exploited them. The cooperative model was proposed as a direct counter to this – replacing the trader-moneylender with an institution owned and governed by the tribal community itself.

Origin and structure of LAMPS

The LAMPS scheme originated in 1973, when the K.S. Bawa Committee recommended the formation of large multipurpose societies in tribal areas, with the Reserve Bank of India’s Agricultural Department taking the lead. The concept was to create a single institutional umbrella in tribal talukas that could handle credit, marketing, consumer distribution, and agricultural inputs together – rather than fragmented services from different agencies.

LAMPS are generally one per taluka, and membership is restricted to adult members of any Scheduled Tribe community. Each society is governed democratically – a General Body of all members elects a Board of Directors, which then manages day-to-day operations. This structure ensures that the society remains answerable to its tribal members rather than to outside stakeholders.

What LAMPS actually do on the ground

The functions of LAMPS span across the full economic lifecycle of a tribal household. Their primary objective is to provide credit and distribute agricultural inputs to improve farm productivity, while also helping in marketing agricultural and minor forest produce. In practice, this translates to a wide range of services:

Credit at concessional rates: LAMPS provide short-term, medium-term, and consumption loans at lower interest rates, directly reducing a family’s dependence on private moneylenders. LAMPS also stand as guarantors for tribal women seeking financial assistance from agencies like NSTFDC, opening formal credit channels for women who would otherwise have no access.

Marketing of tribal produce: LAMPS purchase minor forest produce – honey, tamarind, mahua flowers, tendu leaves, medicinal herbs, and more – directly from tribal collectors at government-approved minimum support prices, bypassing the middleman. Some LAMPS have gone further, packaging produce under a common brand name to sell through organized retail channels, improving price realization for their members.

Consumer goods distribution: LAMPS run fair price shops and supermarkets to supply essential commodities at reasonable prices to their members. They also distribute food grains to SC and ST student hostels, extending their reach beyond purely economic transactions into social welfare.

Agricultural input supply: Seeds, fertilizers, and tools are made available through LAMPS, reducing the cost of cultivation for tribal farmers and reducing their need to buy on credit from private suppliers.

Value addition and processing: Some LAMPS operate cold storage facilities, processing units that mill grains or package fruits, and even primary health centers for their communities.

Tribal Development Co-operative Corporations (TDCC)

While LAMPS operate at the taluka or primary level, Tribal Development Co-operative Corporations (TDCCs) function as apex-level institutions – coordinating tribal development across an entire state or multiple districts. The most prominent example is the Tribal Development Co-operative Corporation of Odisha Ltd. (TDCCOL), established in October 1967 under the ST & SC Development Department of the Odisha Government. It remains one of the oldest and most active tribal apex co-operatives in the country.

TDCCOL was established with the objective of preventing exploitation of tribal communities by middlemen and moneylenders, and ensuring that basic household articles are available near villages at fair prices. It operates across 13 branches covering all Tribal Sub-Plan blocks of Odisha. Minor forest produce and surplus agricultural produce are marketed under the brand name Adisha, while handicrafts and handloom items are branded as Tribes Odisha, sold through exclusive retail outlets called “Tribal World.”

Other states have similar structures. Tripura’s Scheduled Tribes Co-operative Development Corporation, set up in 1979, provides term loans to tribal youth across transport, agriculture, and business sectors, and also extends education loans for higher studies. West Bengal, Maharashtra, and several other states have their own TDCC equivalents, each operating under the respective State Co-operative Societies Act.

The role of TRIFED at the national level

Above the state-level TDCCs sits TRIFED – the Tribal Co-operative Marketing Development Federation of India, established in 1987 under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984, and administered by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs. TRIFED functions as a national-level apex body that supports tribal co-operatives in marketing operations, including price support for minor forest produce.

The MSP for Minor Forest Produce scheme, launched in 2013-14 and implemented through TRIFED, now covers 87 notified MFP items including tendu leaves, mahua, tamarind, honey, and lac. The scheme specifically addresses the structural problems LAMPS were always trying to solve – fair pricing, elimination of middlemen, and market access. TDCCOL in Odisha is the designated State Procurement Agency for this scheme in Tribal Sub-Plan blocks, with procurement carried out through primary-level LAMPS and self-help groups.

Concessional finance: the backbone of tribal co-operatives

Access to affordable credit is arguably the most critical function tribal co-operatives perform. State governments and NABARD have made continuous efforts to improve financial flows to tribal communities, recognizing that indebtedness to moneylenders leads directly to the problem of bonded labour. LAMPS serve as the institutional bridge – collecting membership fees and deposits from members, channeling government grants under the Tribal Sub-Plan, and acting as agents for co-operative banks to provide both short-term production loans and long-term development credit.

The concessional interest rate on loans is a key advantage. Private moneylenders in tribal areas have historically charged usurious rates, often with produce pledged as collateral at deflated values. LAMPS break this dynamic by offering credit against productive activity rather than against debt servitude. Over time, especially where women’s participation has been encouraged, the acquisition of formal bank accounts – with a passbook in the member’s own name – has become a mark of both economic identity and self-respect for tribal women.

Challenges that limit the effectiveness of tribal co-operatives

Despite their structural advantages, tribal co-operatives face persistent challenges. In Karnataka, a detailed analysis found that LAMPS were neither economically viable, socially empowering, nor ecologically sustainable in their current form. Several systemic issues contribute to this:

Governance gaps: Corruption, misappropriation of funds, and the absence of dedicated and honest officials undermine the purpose of co-operatives. Leakages in fund allocation mean that credit often does not reach the intended beneficiaries in adequate amounts.

Exclusion of the landless: Co-operatives typically do not extend loans to landless tribal people, which excludes a significant portion of the most economically vulnerable from the very institutions designed for their welfare.

Limited infrastructure: Many LAMPS operate in areas with restricted access to technology and modern tools, making it difficult to compete with private sector buyers who have better logistics, refrigeration, and market intelligence.

Over-dependence on government support: Many LAMPS and TDCCs depend heavily on government subsidies and the Tribal Sub-Plan for operational funding. Any policy change or funding disruption directly stalls their activities.

Coordination failures: Inconsistent coordination between forest, tribal, and commerce departments hinders effective management of minor forest produce. LAMPS often operate without reliable market information, leading to suboptimal procurement and pricing decisions.

Way forward: making tribal co-operatives work better

The solution lies in both institutional reforms and complementary government programmes. Initiatives like Van Dhan Vikas Kendras (VDVKs), which set up clusters of tribal gatherers for value addition and skill training, represent a promising direction – moving co-operatives from simple procurement to processing and entrepreneurship. When tribal communities are trained to add value to raw produce before selling, they capture a far greater share of the final market price.

Digital integration is equally important. E-commerce platforms like Tribes India E-Marketplace enable tribal products to reach buyers nationally and internationally, bypassing multiple layers of intermediaries. For this to work at scale, LAMPS need investment in basic infrastructure – drying yards, cold storage, and packaging units – alongside training for cooperative managers in financial literacy and market operations.

Ultimately, the cooperative model for tribal communities is not broken in concept – it is the implementation that needs strengthening. Where LAMPS and TDCCs have functioned well, they have demonstrably improved household incomes, reduced indebtedness, and given tribal communities institutional agency over their own economic lives. The challenge is scaling what works and fixing what does not – particularly by ensuring credit reaches the landless, governance is transparent, and infrastructure keeps pace with market demands.

What do you think? Given that tribal co-operatives like LAMPS have existed for over five decades, why do significant portions of tribal communities still prefer private moneylenders for credit despite the higher interest rates? And should the membership criteria for LAMPS be expanded to include landless tribal families, and what safeguards would be needed to make that workable?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

References
  1. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1805582.pdf
  2. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/forest-policy-and-tribal-development
  3. https://trifed.tribal.gov.in/program/non-timber
  4. https://c4scourses.in/blog/large-area-multipurpose-co-operative-society-lamps/
  5. https://www.research-advances.org/index.php/IJEMS/article/download/862/803
  6. https://www.rcs.tn.gov.in/mpd_cooperative_4.php
  7. https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/large-area-multipurpose-societies-lamps-scheme/
  8. https://sahakara.kar.gov.in/othersocieties.html
  9. https://stsc.odisha.gov.in/corporations/TDCOL
  10. https://rtiodisha.gov.in/Pages/printAllManual/office_id:151/lang:
  11. https://twd.tripura.gov.in/tripura-scheduled-tribes-cooperative-development-corporation
  12. https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/trifed-tribal-cooperative-marketing-development-federation-of-india/
  13. https://www.gktoday.in/minor-forest-produce-mfp/
  14. https://www.ijmra.us/project%20doc/2018/IJRSS_APRIL2018/IJMRA-13697.pdf
PDF 📄

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Co-operation – Genesis, Principles, Values, Growth and Development

1 Genesis of Co-operative Movement in India and Few Selected Countries

  1. Characteristics of Co-operative Enterprise
  2. Objectives of Co-operation
  3. Origin and Development of Co-operative Movement in India
  4. History of the Co-operative Movement in India up to 1947
  5. England (Consumer Co-operative Movement)
  6. Germany (Raiffeisen and Schulze)
  7. Dairy Co-operatives in Denmark
  8. Co-operatives in Israel (Collective Farming)
  9. New Age Co-operatives

2 Development of Co-operative Principles and Values including ICA Restated Principles, 1995

  1. International Co-operative Alliance (ICA)
  2. Rochdale Principles
  3. ICA Statement on Co-operative Identity – 1995
  4. Principles of 1995 Co-operative Statement
  5. Co-operative Values

3 Co-operative Autonomy, Distinctive Features of Democratice Management in Co-operatives vis-a-vis Companies

  1. Nature of Co-operatives
  2. Principles of Co-operatives
  3. Democratic Member Control as a Restated Principle (1995)
  4. Features of a Co-operative
  5. Comparison between a Co-operative and Company

4 Co-operative Policy and Support at Centre and States (After 1990)

  1. Model Co-operative Law
  2. Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act 1995
  3. Enactment of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act 2002
  4. National Co-operative Policy 2002
  5. Vaidyanathan Committee Recommendations

5 Phase-I 1st to 3rd Five Year Plan

  1. First Five Year Plan (1951-1956)
  2. Second Five Year Plan (1956-1961)
  3. Third Five Year Plan (1961-1966)

6 Phase-II 4th to 8th Five Year Plan

  1. Introduction
  2. Fourth Five Year Plan (1969-1974)
  3. Fifth Five Year Plan (1974-1979)
  4. Sixth Five Year Plan (1980-1985)
  5. Seventh Five Year Plan (1985-1990)
  6. Eighth Five Year Plan (1992-1997)

7 Phase-III 9th to 11th Five Year Plan

  1. Ninth Five Year Plan (1997-2002)
  2. Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007)
  3. Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012)

8 Present Status of Co-Operative Movement

  1. Spread of Co-operatives
  2. Share of Co-operatives in National Economy
  3. Significance of Co-operative Movement
  4. Important Sectors of Co-operative Movement
  5. Problems of Co-operative Movement
  6. Issues/Challenges before Co-operative Movement

9 Types of Co-Operatives

  1. Co-operative Marketing
  2. Co-operative Processing
  3. Co-operative Farming
  4. Consumer Co-operative
  5. Industrial Co-operatives
  6. Housing Co-operatives
  7. Dairy Co-operative
  8. Fishery Co-operatives
  9. Transport Co-operatives
  10. Education Societies
  11. Labour Co-operatives
  12. Hospital Co-operatives
  13. Agri-tourism Co-operatives

10 Study of Co-Operative Credit Institutions

  1. Origin
  2. Co-operative Rural Credit Institutions in India
  3. Credit Co-operative Movement after Independence
  4. Long Term Credit
  5. Co-operative Rural Credit Institutions – Issues
  6. Non-Agricultural Co-operative Credit Institutions

11 Study of Marketing, Consumer, Processing Co-Operatives

  1. Marketing Co-operative
  2. Consumer Co-operative
  3. Sugar Co-operative
  4. Dairy Co-operative

12 Study of Co-Operatives for Weaker Section– Labour, Tribal, Fishery, Weavers, Women

  1. Importance of Weaker Section Co-operatives
  2. Different Weaker Section Co-operatives
  3. Fishery Co-operatives
  4. Tribal Co-operatives
  5. Labour Co-operatives
  6. Weavers’ Co-operatives
  7. Women Co-operatives

13 Study of Other Types of Co-Operatives- Housing, Fertilizer

  1. Housing Co-operatives
  2. Fertilizer Co-operatives
  3. Health Co-operatives
  4. Tourism Co-operatives
  5. Tree Growers’ Co-operative Societies

14 Findings and Recommendations of Important Committees (1954- 1989)

  1. All India Rural Credit Survey Committee Report – 1954
  2. Committee on Co-operation – 1965
  3. All India Rural Credit Review Committee (AIRCRC) – 1969
  4. Madhava Das Committee – 1978
  5. Report of the Committee on Co-operative Law for Democratisation and Professionalisation of Management in Co-operatives – 1987
  6. Report of the Agricultural Credit Review Committee – 1989

15 Findings and Recommendations of Important Committees (1991- 2010)

  1. Report of the Committee on Model Co-operative Act – 1991
  2. Report of the Committee on Licensing of New Urban Co-operative Banks
  3. Report of the Task Force on Revival of Rural Co-operative Credit Institutions (2005)
  4. Report of the High Powered Committee on Co-operatives (2009)

16 Role of Regulatory and Development Institutions for Co-operative Movement

  1. Role Functions of Reserve Bank of India
  2. Role Functions of NABARD
  3. Role Functions of NCDC
  4. Role Functions of NDDB
  5. Promotional Role of Registrar of Co-operative Societies in Co-operative Development

17 Co-Operative Training and Education

  1. Evolution of Co-operative Training and Education
  2. Structure of Co-operative Training and Education under NCUI
  3. Co-operative Training and Education Facilities in Junior Training Centres in States
  4. Co-operative Training and Education provided by other Co-operative Organizations